AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Acronis true image torrents11/6/2022 Keep in mind that the latest version provides other new features, other than speed, which may be important to you.Adobe Media Encoder CC 2021 v15.1 Pre-Cracked For MacOS ⚡️ 100% Working □Īdobe Media Encoder 2021 software automates the process of creating multiple encoded versions of source files, Adobe Premiere Pro sequences, and Adobe After Effects compositions. Still, I was surprised at how similar the compression speeds were between the two versions. I suspect the reason AME did not speed up to the same degree as the latest version of Compressor is that Adobe wanted to maintain parity between the Windows and Macintosh versions of the software, which prevented them from taking advantage of the available hardware acceleration that iMac CPUs provide. I would expect a current MacBook Pro to match the speeds of the iMac, assuming the same CPU speed, ☑0%. Past tests have shown AME performs much faster on a MacPro, but not faster than Compressor on an iMac.īased on past tests, I did not test this on a current version MacBook Pro, as both the iMac and MacBook Pro use similar Intel chips. I would expect the software to take advantage of the GPUs on the Mac Pro which would make it faster, but I would expect the speed differences between the two versions to be similar. I no longer have access to a new Mac Pro, so I can’t test AME on that system. In the case of XDCAM, AME is more than three times slower.Ĭlick here to download a 2-page PDF with more detailed test results. (Duration is expressed as Hours:Minutes:Seconds.)Īs you can see in the chart, the speed improvements in the 2015 version are slight and, in the case of 2-pass compression, the new version is slower than the older version.Īt no time does the latest version of AME exceed the speed of the latest version of Apple Compressor. What I did, to compare results, was total the amount of time it took to compress all four files, using both 1-pass (fastest) and 2-pass (theoretically the highest quality) compression. (Click the image to download a 2-page PDF providing more detailed test results.) All source media and resulting compressed files were stored locally. No other changes were made to the compression setting for this test. To allow me to compare results between software, I changed the default bit rate from 16 mbps to 10 mbps, which matched the default bit rate for Apple Compressor. These are the same test files I used in all previous compression speed tests, so you can compare results between tests.ĭuring compression all files were scaled to 1280 x 720, using the YouTube 720 preset shipped with Adobe Media Encoder.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |